Name the decision
- Write the choice and decision date.
- Name who has authority to act.
Learn · Core skill lab
Instrument the behaviour that proves value and pre-commit to what the numbers will make you do.
Your work saves in this browser.
Field tools
Copy these into your interview, agent, review, or working document. They are specific to this repetition.
Give each event one behavioural meaning.
EVENT: [actor]_[past-tense action]_[object] FIRES WHEN: exact observable condition REQUIRED PROPERTIES: identity, object, source, timestamp MUST NOT FIRE WHEN: test/retry/preview conditions QUALITY CHECK: raw records or session replay used to verify it DECISION SUPPORTED: continue / change / stop
Run this ritual before proposing features.
1. Is the data trustworthy enough to decide? 2. Which segment moved, and what mechanism could explain it? 3. Where did users fail or need rescue? 4. What do five raw examples show? 5. Which pre-committed rule applies? 6. What will we change, by whom, by when?
Calibrate judgment
A team is testing guided setup for collaborative workspaces.
Continue only if 35% of new workspace owners invite a teammate and both complete one shared task within 24 hours, while fewer than 10% need support rescue. Review by team vs solo intent and replay five failures before changing UI.
Why it works: The event proves collaborative value, includes a quality guardrail, and dictates the next decision.
Track signups, DAU, button clicks, time on page, and NPS. Review monthly and improve onboarding if engagement is low.
Why it fails: The metrics do not define value, cannot diagnose failure, and have no pre-committed action.
Review → revise → repeat
Check only standards your current artifact actually meets. Then record one consequential revision before exporting it.