Shape · Core skill lab

90-Day Strategic Choice

Turn a list of plausible initiatives into one coherent product bet with a mechanism, sacrifice, and evidence gate.

Start the lab
Decision
Which product advantage will we concentrate on for the next 90 days—and what will we stop doing?
Timebox
90 minutes + one decision review
Output
90-day strategy memo
Bring to the bench
  • A business or product outcome that matters now
  • Evidence from customers, product use, and constraints
  • A decision owner who can say no

Your work saves in this browser.

Step 1 / 5 · 15 min

Name the outcome

Anchor strategy to a changed state rather than an initiative portfolio.
  1. Use a 90-day horizon.
  2. Choose a user behaviour or business state the product can influence.
  3. Diagnose why it is not happening now.
Required fields must be completed to sign off.

Field tools

Use the instrument, not a blank page.

Copy these into your interview, agent, review, or working document. They are specific to this repetition.

template

Strategy kernel

Use this sequence to keep ambition, diagnosis, and action connected.

OUTCOME — changed state in 90 days
DIAGNOSIS — mechanism preventing it now + evidence
ARENA — segment × workflow × trigger
GUIDING CHOICE — how we will create advantage
SACRIFICE — what we will not pursue
COHERENT ACTIONS — 3–5 reinforcing moves
EVIDENCE GATES — commit / adapt / stop + review date
checklist

Choice pressure test

If every option survives, the strategy has not made a choice.

Could a reasonable leader choose a different option?
Does the choice deny resources to something attractive?
Do the actions reinforce one mechanism?
Can a team reject work using this strategy?
Is the advantage more specific than “better UX” or “AI”?
Can evidence within 90 days overturn the call?

Calibrate judgment

Compare the evidence, not the polish.

Useful

A strategy that rejects work

An agency handoff product is under pressure to broaden acquisition and segments.

For 90 days, concentrate on trusted, source-linked agency handoffs. Pause freelancer onboarding and new acquisition integrations. Reinforce the choice with cited extraction quality, source-type UX, five agency partners, and trust instrumentation. Stop if repeat handoff use remains below 20% after the trust gate passes.

Why it works: The diagnosis, arena, advantage, reinforcing actions, sacrifice, and stop condition form one falsifiable system.

Looks finished. Is not.

A roadmap wearing strategy clothes

Our strategy is to grow engagement by improving onboarding, adding AI, launching integrations, expanding internationally, and investing in enterprise features.

Why it fails: There is no diagnosis, mechanism, priority, sacrifice, or evidence that can reject work.

Review → revise → repeat

The artifact is the beginning of the rep.

Check only standards your current artifact actually meets. Then record one consequential revision before exporting it.

Quality gate · 0/4 met
Proof checkpoint

Keep the live attempt in your account workspace; copy or download Markdown when you need a portable record.

Start fresh

This clears the locally saved attempt for this lab.